Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
1.
Vaccine ; 38(48): 7668-7673, 2020 11 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33071002

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: More than 100 COVID-19 vaccine candidates are in development since the SARS-CoV-2 genetic sequence was published in January 2020. The uptake of a COVID-19 vaccine among children will be instrumental in limiting the spread of the disease as herd immunity may require vaccine coverage of up to 80% of the population. Prior history of pandemic vaccine coverage was as low as 40% among children in the United States during the 2009 H1N1 influenza pandemic. PURPOSE: To investigate predictors associated with global caregivers' intent to vaccinate their children against COVID-19, when the vaccine becomes available. METHOD: An international cross sectional survey of 1541 caregivers arriving with their children to 16 pediatric Emergency Departments (ED) across six countries from March 26 to May 31, 2020. RESULTS: 65% (n = 1005) of caregivers reported that they intend to vaccinate their child against COVID-19, once a vaccine is available. A univariate and subsequent multivariate analysis found that increased intended uptake was associated with children that were older, children with no chronic illness, when fathers completed the survey, children up-to-date on their vaccination schedule, recent history of vaccination against influenza, and caregivers concerned their child had COVID-19 at the time of survey completion in the ED. The most common reason reported by caregivers intending to vaccinate was to protect their child (62%), and the most common reason reported by caregivers refusing vaccination was the vaccine's novelty (52%). CONCLUSIONS: The majority of caregivers intend to vaccinate their children against COVID-19, though uptake will likely be associated with specific factors such as child and caregiver demographics and vaccination history. Public health strategies need to address barriers to uptake by providing evidence about an upcoming COVID-19 vaccine's safety and efficacy, highlighting the risks and consequences of infection in children, and educating caregivers on the role of vaccination.


Assuntos
Betacoronavirus/patogenicidade , Infecções por Coronavirus/prevenção & controle , Pandemias/prevenção & controle , Pneumonia Viral/prevenção & controle , Recusa de Vacinação/psicologia , Vacinação/psicologia , Vacinas Virais/economia , Adulto , Betacoronavirus/imunologia , COVID-19 , Vacinas contra COVID-19 , Criança , Infecções por Coronavirus/economia , Infecções por Coronavirus/epidemiologia , Infecções por Coronavirus/imunologia , Infecções por Coronavirus/virologia , Estudos Transversais , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Europa (Continente)/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Imunidade Coletiva , Cooperação Internacional , Israel/epidemiologia , Japão/epidemiologia , Masculino , Análise Multivariada , América do Norte/epidemiologia , Pneumonia Viral/epidemiologia , Pneumonia Viral/imunologia , Pneumonia Viral/virologia , SARS-CoV-2 , Cobertura Vacinal/estatística & dados numéricos , Recusa de Vacinação/estatística & dados numéricos , Vacinas Virais/biossíntese
2.
Patient Educ Couns ; 103(9): 1830-1838, 2020 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32418681

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: This is a quality assessment of a research design developed for a collaborative study on adolescents and young adults who survived a brain tumor. METHODS: A descriptive and critical mixed methods approach was used to assess the design itself, the quality and information power of the database and the integration of collaborators. Project documentation, field notes and transcripts from focus groups interviews(n = 19) were used for the evaluation, which was based on the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research. RESULTS: The design proved to be pertinent to resolve methodological stakes in a "fragile field". The mobilisation of collaborators as members of a "Sherpa team" in all phases of the project helped the team create a progressive focus approach well-adapted for data gathering and analysis as well as produce a high-quality database. CONCLUSION: The Nesting Dolls Design including the didactic approach developed along the deployment of the project helped researchers, clinicians and resource patients/parents understand the research procedures and the roles of all collaborators. This fostered a meaningful engagement in the project. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Resources and time for training, communication and supervision are necessary to reach the objectives of collaborative research involving novices and are worth the time and efforts.


Assuntos
Sobreviventes de Câncer , Comportamento Cooperativo , Pais , Médicos , Garantia da Qualidade dos Cuidados de Saúde , Neoplasias Encefálicas/terapia , Feminino , Grupos Focais , Pesquisa sobre Serviços de Saúde , Humanos , Entrevistas como Assunto , Masculino , Projetos de Pesquisa , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA